[bwna] URGENT: Re: Here is some info on the Secretary of the BWNA

[Albert Kaufman]

Sorry about that, Jim, and everyone.  Guess I was mistaken, sure looks real.
Albert

> Mr Kaufman,
> 
> You have spread libelous information about me by your posting information
> (attached below) to the BWNA mailing list.
> 
> As anyone who knows me should know, I would not make a number of the
> statements found there, especially the racist statement found on that blog. I
> am surprised that you believed it was a genuine site, especially in view of
> the racist statement.
> 
> To repeat:
> This is NOT MY WEB SITE --  I had no part what so ever in the creation or
> posating of this web site.
> 
> I have asked the host to remove this site. If it is not removed soon, I will
> be taking legal action. Hopefully such action will not need to include you.
> 
> To be clear: 
> 
> THIS IS A DEMAND THAT YOU IMMEDIATELY cease spreading the lies found on that
> site, including its existence in any context that implies it has any
> legitimate connection to me.
> 
> Further I demand that you immediately contact anyone that you have previously
> contacted about that site and make it clear that I have NO CONNECTION WHAT SO
> EVER with this site.
> 
> The very fact that you included a racist quote in your posting to BWNA
> indicates some intent to defame me. Don't make it worse by continuing.
> 
> I should mention that few things on the Internet are really anonymous and the
> person behind this fraud will soon be discovered and forced to pay a price
> through the legal system.
> 
> Thanks
> JK
> 
> 
> 
> 
> At 11:02 AM 12/23/2009, Albert Kaufman wrote:
>> I just came across this via a Blueoregon post, and found out that Jim is
>> running for office.  Here’s your secretary.
>> 
>> http://karlockformetro.blogspot.com/
>> 
>> Thursday, 19 November 2009
>> Some Policy Talking Points
>> Neighborhood Density
>> 
>> We should stop encouraging density with our laws and tax money. (And quit
>> zoning farms for housing!) There's a reason that whites flee areas infest
>> with negroes, illegals and, of course, crime.
>> 
>> My opponent said that it is necessary to have more density (Mercury candidate
>> interview)
>> Cap & Trade Tax on Fossil Fuels
>> (The price will be MADE TO RISE, WITHOUT LIMIT, UNTIL PEOPLE ARE FORCED TO
>> CUT BACK USAGE BY 44% )
>> 
>> I oppose. It will increase YOUR gasoline cost.
>> I oppose. It will increase YOUR heating cost
>> I oppose. It will increase YOUR electric bill
>> 
>> 
>> My opponent favors taxs
>> (Statement to the LWV in spring 2008 and WW interview)
>> He knows it will increase your cost of energy!
>> A new tax on energy
>> 
>> I oppose. Energy is already too expensive. Drill away. I will not live long
>> enough to live with the consequences. Most won't. Screw it. Not our problem.
>> 
>> My opponent favors this tax. (WW interview)
>> Real Estate Sales Tax
>> 
>> I oppose. This will make housing cost and rents go up. Over 25s without
>> children should not vote. It is a duty. What else will hold up real estate
>> values? "Be fruitful and multiply" God has commanded it.
>> 
>> My opponent favors this tax. (Mercury interview)
>> Surcharge on income tax
>> 
>> I oppose. We are already taxed enough.
>> 
>> My opponent favors this tax (if minor and temporary!)
>> Energy Cost
>> 
>> I favor lower energy costs the only way that costs have 2ever fallen - by
>> increasing supply.
>> Without access to affordable energy, Americans ... cannot afford to climb
>> that ladder to success. N. Innis, CORE. Drill downtown Portland, idiots! Get
>> a clue.
>> 
>> My opponent favors Energy Tax and Cap & Trade which will INCREASE energy cost
>> Policies that hurt me and my friends.
>> 
>> I oppose. We need to protect the vulnerable in our community. They cannot
>> vote their own interests. That's why we have an education.
>> 
>> My opponent's Energy cost increases, housing cost increase hurt the poor more
>> than they hurt upper income people. He favors these policies.
>> Secret ballot in union elections
>> 
>> Of course elections should be secret ballot! Now, if we could make the unions
>> have to go secret as well!
>> 
>> My opponent opposes the secret ballot.
>> 
>> Smart Growth
>> (tax subsidies to high density, forcing you out of your car by making driving
>> more expensive and more difficult and , laws to force much higher
>> neighborhood densities, very dense apartment/condos complexes on bus and
>> light rail streets.)
>> 
>> I oppose. We already have too many skinny houses squeezed in our neighborhood
>> degrading our neighborhood's livability. All growth is smart.
>> 
>> My opponent favors "smart growth" policies that require tax subsidies,
>> increased density and making it difficult to drive a car. Cars first, and
>> people will follow. That's common sense.
>> 
>> Diverting School Money to Real Estate Developers
>> 
>> I oppose. We must quit diverting any basic services money to developers.
>> 
>> My opponent favors smart growth & high density - Taking money from basic
>> services is the key funding mechanism that makes these schemes work
>> Gentrification - high housing costs. I am opposed to all "smart growth".
>> 
>> I oppose. Government policies that encourage high density and gentrification.
>> 
>> My opponent favors smart growth & high density - which cause a large part of
>> gentrification and high housing costs.
>> Posted by James Karlock at 10:51
>> 1 comments:
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bwna.us/pipermail/bwna_bwna.us/attachments/20091223/4a4b5c9b/attachment-0001.html>