[bwna] URGENT: Re: Here is some info on the Secretary of the BWNA

[Johnston, Liz]

PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM ANY EMAIL CONVERSATIONS DIRECTED TO BWNA ON ANY
CONVERSATION. I'VE ASKED FOR THIS TO BE DONE AND IT HASN'T BEEN TAKEN
CARE OF.

 

THANK YOU,

 

-----------------------------

Liz Johnston

University of Portland

Student Accounts MSC 156

5000 N Willamette Blvd 

Portland OR 97203

(503)943-7347

 

From: bwna-bounces at bwna.us [mailto:bwna-bounces at bwna.us] On Behalf Of
Jim Karlock
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 3:00 PM
To: Albert Kaufman
Cc: BWNA
Subject: [bwna] URGENT: Re: Here is some info on the Secretary of the
BWNA

 

Mr Kaufman,

You have spread libelous information about me by your posting
information (attached below) to the BWNA mailing list. 

As anyone who knows me should know, I would not make a number of the
statements found there, especially the racist statement found on that
blog. I am surprised that you believed it was a genuine site, especially
in view of the racist statement.

To repeat:
This is NOT MY WEB SITE --  I had no part what so ever in the creation
or posating of this web site.

I have asked the host to remove this site. If it is not removed soon, I
will be taking legal action. Hopefully such action will not need to
include you.

To be clear: 

THIS IS A DEMAND THAT YOU IMMEDIATELY cease spreading the lies found on
that site, including its existence in any context that implies it has
any legitimate connection to me. 

Further I demand that you immediately contact anyone that you have
previously contacted about that site and make it clear that I have NO
CONNECTION WHAT SO EVER with this site.

The very fact that you included a racist quote in your posting to BWNA
indicates some intent to defame me. Don't make it worse by continuing.

I should mention that few things on the Internet are really anonymous
and the person behind this fraud will soon be discovered and forced to
pay a price through the legal system.

Thanks
JK




At 11:02 AM 12/23/2009, Albert Kaufman wrote:



I just came across this via a Blueoregon post, and found out that Jim is
running for office.  Here's your secretary.  

http://karlockformetro.blogspot.com/

Thursday, 19 November 2009
Some Policy Talking Points
Neighborhood Density

We should stop encouraging density with our laws and tax money. (And
quit zoning farms for housing!) There's a reason that whites flee areas
infest with negroes, illegals and, of course, crime.

My opponent said that it is necessary to have more density (Mercury
candidate interview)
Cap & Trade Tax on Fossil Fuels
(The price will be MADE TO RISE, WITHOUT LIMIT, UNTIL PEOPLE ARE FORCED
TO CUT BACK USAGE BY 44% )

I oppose. It will increase YOUR gasoline cost.
I oppose. It will increase YOUR heating cost
I oppose. It will increase YOUR electric bill


My opponent favors taxs
(Statement to the LWV in spring 2008 and WW interview)
He knows it will increase your cost of energy!
A new tax on energy

I oppose. Energy is already too expensive. Drill away. I will not live
long enough to live with the consequences. Most won't. Screw it. Not our
problem.

My opponent favors this tax. (WW interview)
Real Estate Sales Tax

I oppose. This will make housing cost and rents go up. Over 25s without
children should not vote. It is a duty. What else will hold up real
estate values? "Be fruitful and multiply" God has commanded it.

My opponent favors this tax. (Mercury interview)
Surcharge on income tax

I oppose. We are already taxed enough.

My opponent favors this tax (if minor and temporary!)
Energy Cost

I favor lower energy costs the only way that costs have 2ever fallen -
by increasing supply.
Without access to affordable energy, Americans ... cannot afford to
climb that ladder to success. N. Innis, CORE. Drill downtown Portland,
idiots! Get a clue.

My opponent favors Energy Tax and Cap & Trade which will INCREASE energy
cost
Policies that hurt me and my friends.

I oppose. We need to protect the vulnerable in our community. They
cannot vote their own interests. That's why we have an education.

My opponent's Energy cost increases, housing cost increase hurt the poor
more than they hurt upper income people. He favors these policies.
Secret ballot in union elections

Of course elections should be secret ballot! Now, if we could make the
unions have to go secret as well!

My opponent opposes the secret ballot.

Smart Growth
(tax subsidies to high density, forcing you out of your car by making
driving more expensive and more difficult and , laws to force much
higher neighborhood densities, very dense apartment/condos complexes on
bus and light rail streets.)

I oppose. We already have too many skinny houses squeezed in our
neighborhood degrading our neighborhood's livability. All growth is
smart.

My opponent favors "smart growth" policies that require tax subsidies,
increased density and making it difficult to drive a car. Cars first,
and people will follow. That's common sense.

Diverting School Money to Real Estate Developers

I oppose. We must quit diverting any basic services money to developers.

My opponent favors smart growth & high density - Taking money from basic
services is the key funding mechanism that makes these schemes work
Gentrification - high housing costs. I am opposed to all "smart growth".

I oppose. Government policies that encourage high density and
gentrification.

My opponent favors smart growth & high density - which cause a large
part of gentrification and high housing costs.
Posted by James Karlock at 10:51
1 comments:

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bwna.us/pipermail/bwna_bwna.us/attachments/20091223/a7b3b8a5/attachment.html>